North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program
North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program
    Home Contrib Bukovsky Regions
 
  PROGRAM
About NARCCAP
About Data
Contact Us
  RESOURCES
For PIs
For Users
    Access Data
  User Directory
  Contributions
  Acknowledgements
  RESULTS
Output Data Catalog
General Results
    NCEP-Driven RCM Runs
Climate Change Results
CRCM+CCSM
CRCM+CGCM3
ECP2+GFDL
ECP2+HadCM3 NEW!
HRM3+GFDL
HRM3+HadCM3
MM5I+CCSM
MM5I+HadCM3 NEW!
RCM3+CGCM3
RCM3+GFDL
WRFG+CCSM
WRFG+CGCM3
  SPONSORS
 
Bukovsky Regions
 

We use this division of the NARCCAP domain for regional analysis.

Basic Regions

(click for large size)

Compound Regions

(click for large size)

Download

Zipfile containing masks

Masks are in netcdf format. There is a separate mask file for each region. The regions are defined on a half-degree lat/lon grid.

Citation

If you make use of these regions in research, please cite the regionalization as follows:

Bukovsky, M.S., 2011: Masks for the Bukovsky regionalization of North America, Regional Integrated Sciences Collective, Institute for Mathematics Applied to Geosciences, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO. Downloaded 2024-12-06.
[http://www.narccap.ucar.edu/contrib/bukovsky/]

Description

This subregionalization was created to aid in the analysis of NARCCAP simulations in subregions of the North American domain. It is, in essence, a simplification of the terrestrial ecoregions provided in Ricketts et al. (1999), and over the U.S. it closely follows the regions used by NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network, Kampe et al. (2010)). Eco-regions are sensitive to variations in temperature and precipitation, and were judged to be a good proxy for areas of similar regional climatology. Simplified eco-regions also capture important features in regional climate; e.g. the Prairie region captures the U.S. secondary summertime precipitation maximum, and the DeepSouth region captures the eastern U.S. wintertime precipitation maximum. Other climate classifications were also referenced in the creation of this subregionalization (e.g. the Thornthwaite (1984) and Köppen (1900) classifications), but they were generally too complex in western North America, and too simplistic in eastern North America. Simplification of the regions was necessary for ease of analysis, but is also justified based on the resolution of the NARCCAP simulations (50-km). Not all regions are fully based on eco-zones. The Great Lakes region, for one, was shaped to cover most of the appropriate watershed, and the Southwest was created to capture the area of immediate influence by the North American Monsoon.

Ocean regions are based on Spalding et al. (2007), with some simplification. For instance, the small area of Tropical Northwestern Atlantic waters was combined with the Warm (Temperate) NW Atlantic region. Ocean regions are also extended to reach the domain boundaries.

This regionalization was done on a common 1/2 x 1/2 degree lat/lon grid. Some of the regions overhang coastline because of the resolution. A grid box with any percentage of land in it greater than about 25%, after regridding and ensemble averaging the NARCCAP models' land masks, was generally included in a terrestrial region. In some, fully resolvable water regions (e.g. the Gulf of California) were included with terrestrial regions to group together important climatological processes. In waters that are prone to the formation of sea ice in the winter, an effort was made to exclude a greater percentage of the mostly water grid boxes from terrestrial regions, as they can act significantly different than adjacent land.

Out of the 29 regions created in the NARCCAP domain, 13 (initial) groupings have also been created for analysis over larger sub-regions with similar characteristics.


Bibliography

Kampe, T.U., B.R. Johnson, M. Kuester, M. Keller, 2010. NEON: the first continental-scale ecological observatory with airborne remote sensing of vegetation canopy biochemistry and structure. J. Appl. Remote Sensing, 4, 043510.

Köppen, W., 1900: Versuch einer Klassifikation der Klimate, Vorzugsweise nach ihren Beziehungen zur Pflanzenwelt [Attempted climate classification in relation to plant distributions]. Geographische Zeitschrift, 6, 593-611, 657-679.

Ricketts, T.H., and coauthors, 1999. Terrestrial ecoregions of North America: A conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 485p.

Spalding, M.D., H.E. Fox, G.R. Allen, N. Davidson, Z.Z. Ferdana, M. Finlayson, B.S. Halpern, M.A. Jorge, A. Lomvana, S.A. Lourie, K.D. Martin, E. McManus, J. Molnar, C.A. Recchia, and J. Robertson, 2007. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience, 57, 573-583.

Thornthwaite, C.W., 1984. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. The Geographical Review, 38, 55-94.

 
©2007 UCAR   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Use   |   Site Map   |   top of page    
The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.